When a sight record is received, it is
presented to the committee for a "1st round" of reviews. In the first
round the voting members can either accept the record, or reject
it for any of three reasons: (1) the identification was not
sufficiently established by the documentation, (2) the species was
not shown to be naturally occurring or (3) establishment of a
naturally breeding population has not been established. ( see
section IV.C.3 of the Bylaws).
So the review is completely independent, votes and comments from the first round are not shared
with other voting members until the round is completed.
The decision in the first round has to be unanimous -- if any
reviewer has reservations or questions about a record, it can
be sent to a second round.In the "2nd round" votes and comments
from the first round are presented to
the committee. With new input from other members, a second review
of the record is conducted yielding new votes and comments. A
final decision is made if at least 6 of 9 members (or
a greater proportion) are in agreement.
If the vote in the 2nd round is "non-decisive" (receiving
fewer than 6 votes either way) the record goes to a "3rd round" where the comments
and "arguments" from the previous rounds are consider before a
final vote is taken. If the record is accepted by a simple
majority of the voting members then the record will be accepted as an
official sighting for Utah and placed on the
official sightings list,
otherwise it will be placed on the "Comprehensive
List of Rare Birds Sightings" list, which includes official
sightings plus undocumented and other unofficial sightings.
(For all the details, see the UBRC Bylaws).
|