Re: re: initiative #1

To: <Roostertael at aol dot com>
Subject: Re: re: initiative #1
From: "james.d.mcintyre" <james dot d dot mcintyre at worldnet dot att dot net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 16:55:26 -0700
Cc: "BIRDTALK" <birdtalk@utahbirds.org>
References: <76.450c0441.2eb80f7f@aol.com>
Reply-to: "james.d.mcintyre" <james dot d dot mcintyre at worldnet dot att dot net>
Sender: owner-birdtalk@utahbirds.org

Jack:

The pros and cons of INIATIVE 1 are spelled out in detail in the 2004 UTAH VOTER INFORMAYION PACKET that you should have received in the mail.

It includes about $20 million for UDWR - for preserving fish and wildlife habitat.

Jim

----- Original Message -----

From: Roostertael@aol.com

To: birdtalk@utahbirds.org

Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 3:15 PM

Subject: [BirdTalk] re: initiative #1

Maybe someone can clear this up before I vote tomorrow.

Will the lands that are purchased by this group be open to the general public? I am for saving open space, but not if it cannot be used by everyone.

Jack

References:
- re: initiative #1
  - From: Roostertael@aol.com

Prev by Date: RE: initiative #1
Next by Date: RE: re: initiative #1
Index(es):
- Date