|  Two Messages from Dr. 
      Christopher W. Thompson Message #1: 
      From: "Chris Thompson"  
      To: "Kristin Purdy"  
      Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 3:57 PM  
      Subject: RE: Initial assessment  
       
      Hi Kris,  
       
      Sorry for taking so long to get back to you regarding the photos you sent 
      me of the ASY male Painted Bunting that was photographed in Utah on 24 
      July. To cut to the chase, my best guess - and it is, of course, only an 
      "educated" guess - is that it is a wild bird. My reasoning for this is as 
      follows:  
       
      As you are well aware, by late July, the plumage of adult painted buntings 
      typically is rather ragged. This seems to be especially true of Painted 
      buntings in the west (versus those on the east coast). I'm not sure why 
      this is; it may reflect a more abrasive physical environment, on average, 
      in the west vs the east. In any event, although you are right, of course, 
      that cage wear could also cause plumage to show excessive wear, especially 
      on the tail (as reflected in the bird in the photos), excessive wear, 
      especially of the rectrices, is VERY common in wild birds by late summer 
      (just prior to prebasic molt). 
       
      I remember that excessive wear precluded me from being able to take 
      meaningful/accurate tail measurements on many specimens collected in late 
      summer. The point, unfortunately, is that I don't think the wear pattern 
      on the bird in question helps elucidate whether the birdescaped from 
      captivity or not.  
       
      The plumage pattern that would most strongly support the hypothesis that 
      an adult male painted bunting escaped from captivity would be if the 
      plumage that is normally red was, instead, lighter in color, e.g., 
      typically yellow. This often occurs and reflects either (1) inadequate 
      and/or inappropriate carotenoids of the diet to support growth of red  
      plumage during molt, and/or (2) inability to appropriately metabolize 
      ingested carotenoids, e.g., due to stress, poor health, etc. Small patches 
      of yellow plumage MAY also be indicative of captivity; however if wild 
      birds lose a patch of body plumage outside of the normal molt periods, 
      they often renew the feathers with feathers that are abnormal  
      in color.  
       
      As you also probably know, Painted Buntings are common cage birds in 
      Mexico (and perhaps in the US among Hispanics if they can catch them). 
      Thus it is possible that an escaped cage bird made it from Mexico to Utah; 
      however, probabilistically, the most parsimonious explanation, in my 
      opinion, is that the bird in question is a bona fide wild bird.  
       
      Hope that helps. If you have any other questions, please don't hesitate to 
      contact me.  
       
      Best regards,  
       
      Chris 
      Chris Thompson, Ph.D.  
      Message #2: 
      From: "Chris Thompson"  
      To: "Kristin Purdy"  
      Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 1:10 PM  
      Subject: RE: Initial assessment  
       
      Hi Kris,  
       
      Yes; I agree that the bird clearly is missing patches of feathers that do 
      not correspond to any normal molt pattern; however, the question is: is 
      this pattern of wear/feather loss more likely to result from captivity 
      than conditions in the wild? I don't think the answer to this is at all 
      clear, i.e., I do not think that captivity would be MORE likely to result 
      in such a seemingly aberrant pattern. I certainly observed many such birds 
      in the thousands of specimens that I examined. 
       
      Another reality check is that, as you probably are aware, painted buntings 
      have shown up virtually all over North America (including the east coast, 
      e.g., Pennsylvania) and Canada, the point being that wild Painted Buntings 
      are clearly capable of showing up very far out of range; a "stray" Painted 
      Bunting in Utah is not very far out of range,  
      relatively speaking. So.....taken together, as I said before, I think the 
      parsimonious explanation is that the bird is from the wild.  
       
      Hope that helps. Again, I'm happy to discuss this more if you or anyone  
      else is interested.  
       
      Best regards,  
       
      Chris   | 
        |