Records Committee
Utah Ornithological Society
   
Status & Comments
Year 2002

  
2002-01 - Black-legged Kittiwake

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 31 May 2002 Acc  
Steven H. 16 Jan 2002 Acc  
Ronald R. 20 May 2002 Acc Good photos.
Terry S. 13 Jan 2002 Acc Excellent photos and description
Mark S. 21 Sep 2002 Acc Great description and photo - I wish I'd been able to get this one.
Steven S. 9 Jan 2002 Acc To bad it didn't stay around longer
Merrill W. 25 Jan 2002 Acc Nice photos.

 

2002-02 - Yellow-crowned Night-Heron

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 May 2002 Acc good description and helpful photos
Steven H. 16 Jan 2002 Acc  
Ronald R. 20 May 2002 Acc Unmistakable in photos and good description.
Terry S. 13 Jan 2002 Acc Good careful observation and notes. Photos while not great were convincing.
Mark S. 21 Sep 2002 Acc I thought this had been reviewed before. Photos, even grainy, tell the story.
Steven S. 9 Jan 2002 Acc To bad it didn't stay around longer
Merrill W. 11 Mar 2002 Acc Diagnostic photo
Clayton W. 14 Jan 2002 Acc  

   

2002-03 - Little Gull

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 May 2002 Acc Well documented with excellent photos
Steven H. 16 Jan 2002 Acc Nice to finally get this record resolved.
Ronald R. 20 May 2002 Acc Good photos.
Terry S. 1 Mar 2002 Acc  
Mark S. 21 Sep 2002 Acc Great description and photos. I also saw this bird.
Steven S. 17 Jan 2002 Acc Great photos definitively proving this species.
Merrill W. 11 Mar 2002 Acc Photo acceptable

 

2002-04 - Chestnut-sided Warbler

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 May 2002 Acc Adequately describes key field marks of non-breeding Chestnut-sided Warbler.
Steven H. 3 Apr 2002 Acc  
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 Acc While a brief observation, most key identification marks were seen. No other warbler has the combination of bold eye ring, white underparts, wing bars and reddish striped sides. Timing of sighting consistent with other records and records in Wyoming.
Terry S. 10 Mar 2002 Acc striking fieldmarks were observed and recorded
Mark S. 21 Sep 2002 Acc This is a tough call - the sighting was very brief, and the description a bit scanty (due to brief look, I believe), however, the species is distinctive, even in basic plumage, and the definitive marks well-described by an experienced observer.
Steven S. 4 Mar 2002 Acc The description is adequate for this regular vagrant to the West. The timing and location are good.
Merrill W. 11 Mar 2002 Acc Short viewing time, but adequate description

 

2002-05 - Anna's Hummingbird

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 May 2002 Acc Good description of bird and display behavior. I also observed this bird several times at the Red Cliffs Campground in March, 2001.
Steven H. 3 Apr 2002 Acc  
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 Acc Good basic discription and ruled out somewhat similar Costa's.
Terry S. 10 Mar 2002 Acc Well documented
Mark S. 21 Sep 2002 Acc Good notes - even the behavior/calls described would be sufficient to i.d. this bird.
Steven S. 4 Mar 2002 Acc As the record indicated Priscilla and I did find this bird on Feb. 10, 2001.
Merrill W. 8 Mar 2002 Acc I had a chance to see this same individual at Red Cliffs.  Nice bird.

 

2002-06 - Anna's Hummingbird

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 May 2002 Acc Well described. I also saw this hummingbird on March 31, 2001. Anna's Hummingbirds are becoming less rare in Washington County in the last 3 years, particularly in late winter and early spring.
Steven H. 3 Apr 2002 Acc  
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 Acc Good basic discription and ruled out somewhat similar Costa's.
Terry S. 26 Mar 2002 Acc  
Mark S. 21 Sep 2002 Acc Good description - do we need to continue reviewing these for Washington Co.? It seems like they're pretty regular in the spring.
Steven S. 4 Mar 2002 Acc The description eliminates all other likely hummingbirds at this location. This species is very regular just to the south of Washington Co. in Mohave Co., AZ and it is becoming more regular in the St. George area.
Merrill W. 8 Mar 2002 Acc  

 

2002-07 - Painted Redstart

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 May 2002 Acc well documented.
Steven H. 3 Apr 2002 Acc  
Ronald R. 3 Jul 2002 Acc Good description of a very distinctive bird by experienced
Terry S. 10 Mar 2002 Acc This bird hung around for along time and alot of people got to see it
Mark S. 21 Sep 2002 Acc Excellent description of an unmistakeable species, seen by many, including myself.
Steven S. 4 Mar 2002 Acc Seen well by myself and many others into May.
Merrill W. 11 Mar 2002 Acc Saw this beautiful bird in a beautiful location.

 

2002-08 - Eurasian Collared-Dove

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 31 May 2002 Not A I'm convinced the specimen is an Eurasian Collared-Dove. However, I question this species' natural occurrence in Utah (same concerns with record #14-2000).
   2nd round 2 Oct 2002 Acc I've spent alot of time considering the Eurasian Collared-Dove records and have decided to accept them. The photographs and/or description for both this record and 14-2000 are adequate. Therefore identification is not in question. While the origin of any bird can be questioned, I believe it is most likely that these are wild birds. Collared-Dove occurrence is increasing throughout the western states, and escaped birds would be more likely around urban centers (rather than remote areas like Fish Springs and Blanding).
Steven H. 3 Apr 2002 Acc A bird from SE Utah is likely a wild bird.
   2nd round 17 Oct 2002 Acc Very likely a wild bird.
Ronald R. 20 May 2002 Acc Verified by speciman. Was this collected by someone with a collecting permit?
   2nd round 1 Jan 2003 Acc My comments from the previous round still apply. This species is not typically kept as a cage bird, unlike the similar ringed-turtle dove (S. risoria) so the origin should not be an issue.
Terry S. 10 Mar 2002 Dis As with record 14-2000 I'm convinced this is a Eurasian Collard Dove. Need to discuss if we place the bird on the species list of Utah Given it's history.
   2nd round 1 Oct 2002 Acc [N, int] AS with my earlier comments I am reluctant to accept given the history of this species. [Change to Acc for same reasons as in 14-2000 "I believe we now have a better feel for this species. I have reviewed the literature on the expansion of this species and believe this record should be accepted"]
Mark S. 21 Sep 2002 N, nat It's clearly Eurasian Collared Dove, and from a part of the state where we might expect the first "natural" occurrence to happen, but I'm still not comfortable with this species because it is kept in captivity here, and some recent sightings have proven to be escapees. We should probably discuss acceptance of this species in general.
   2nd round 13 Jan 2003 Acc I think we should end discussion of the "natural" occurrence of this species, and accept or reject based upon the i.d. only. It's clear that we will soon be overrun with these guys.
Steven S. 13 Mar 2002 Acc Upon seeing the photos of the specimen it is clear that this
record pertains to Eurasian Collared-Dove
   2nd round 22 Dec 2002 Acc I don't think there should be any question anymore about the invasion of Eurasian Collared-Doves in the west. All one has to do is read recent regional reports in North American Birds (Ariz., N.M. Colo.) to be convinced we are seeing the beginning of it here in Utah.
Merrill W. 8 Mar 2002 Acc  I've seen and handled the speciman.  Pretty hard to argue
with it when its in hand.
   2nd round 22 Jan 2003 Acc Pretty hard to disagree with a speciman, plus the bird has moved in to the state at Jensen, Spanish Fork (Lake Shore area) and Washington. It just showed up at Blanding in between these other sightings.

 

2002-09 - Blue-winged Warbler

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 May 2002 Acc  
Steven H. 3 Apr 2002 Acc Acceptance based on photos, not write-up.
Ronald R. 20 May 2002 Acc Well documented with speciman. Interesting date as this is later than expected for spring migration.
Terry S. 10 Mar 2002 Acc  
Mark S. 21 Sep 2002 Acc Photos of the specimen are decisive.
Steven S. 13 Mar 2002 Acc The photos clearly show a Blue-winged Warbler
Merrill W. 8 Mar 2002 Acc A speciman is irrefutable.

 

2002-10 - Common Redpoll

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 May 2002 Acc Well described and good photographs
Steven H. 3 Apr 2002 Acc  
Ronald R. 20 May 2002 Acc Good description--well documented. I think we should remove this species from the review list. They are seen at least every other year in northern Utah.
Terry S. 26 Mar 2002 Acc (a second vote - 2 May 2002:  Accept  Comment: Good description and photos)
Mark S. 21 Sep 2002 Acc 2002-10 Common Redpoll A Good description, photo.
Steven S. 2 Apr 2002 Acc The photos clearly show this species
 
Merrill W. 18 Mar 2002 Acc Good description, good bird, nice photos.
 

  

2002-11 - Hudsonian Godwit

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 May 2002 Acc  
Steven H. 3 Apr 2002 Acc  
Ronald R. 20 May 2002 Acc Good description, but did not mention white upper wing stripe. The other characteristics were discussed well. This is a species which we may consider removing from the review list. They are being seen almost annually now, and perhaps have been overlooked in the past.
Terry S. 3 May 2002 Acc  
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc Good notes, not a difficult i.d. in breeding plumage.
Steven S. 2 Apr 2002 Acc The description fits this species and eliminates all other godwits.
Merrill W. 30 Apr 2002 Acc  

  

2002-12 - Curlew Sandpiper (same as 9-2001)

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Steven H. 3 Apr 2002 Acc  
Ronald R.     same as 9-2001
Terry S.     same as 9-2001
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc  
Steven S. 2 Apr 2002 Acc This is the same record as already voted on a should be given the same record number but with a different letter extension. I've already expressed my feelings that all records of the same species should have the same number. This has to be this way or in the future records of the same bird may be confusing. When a record comes in late and the vote has already been taken then we should not vote on the new record, just add the new report to the old record. If only a first round or second round vote has been taken then new reports can be added for future rounds.
Merrill W. 30 Apr 2002 Acc  
Clayton W.     same as 9-2001

   

2002-13 - Chestnut-sided Warbler

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 22 May 2002 Acc Well described.
Steven H. 3 Apr 2002 Acc  
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 Acc Good careful observation and description. No other warbler has these characteristics.
Terry S. 2 May 2002 Acc Good description for a very striking fall bird
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc The notes suggest that this was a female - immature male would have shown a bit of chestnut on the flank.
Steven S. 2 Apr 2002 Acc The description is adequate for this pretty much unmistakable species
Merrill W. 30 Apr 2002 Acc  

 

2002-14 - Clay-colored Sparrow

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 22 May 2002 Acc nice complete description
Steven H. 12 Jun 2002 Acc Good description and comparisons
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 Acc Excellent description and differentiation from Brewer's sparrow which were present for comparison.
Terry S. 2 May 2002 Acc Very good detailed description with excellent separation from Brewer's
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc Good comparison with Brewer's.
Steven S. 11 Jun 2002 Acc Most of the basic field marks for Clay-colored Sparrow were observed. In my experience at first glance a nice breeding plumage Clay-colored Sparrow often reminds me more of a Lark Sparrow with a distinctly patterned face. This seems to be a good Spring for this Species in the Great Basin.
Merrill W. 13 Jun 2002 Acc  

 

2002-15 - Bronzed Cowbird

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 22 May 2002 Acc A very thorough description
Steven H. 12 Jun 2002 Acc Key field marks observed.
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 Acc Good careful description and was observed with brown-headed cowbirds for comparison.
Terry S. 21 May 2002 Acc Comparison with Brown-headed Cowbirds that were present helped in identification.
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc A bit of a tricky i.d. in the female - the eye color can be hard to see well in a quick look, but the description of the bill shape and size, as well as the head size, all support this i.d.
Steven S. 11 Jun 2002 Acc Basically a good description of a female Bronzed Cowbird. The red-orange eye probably clinches this ID.
Merrill W. 2 Jul 2002 Acc Adequate description.

   

2002-16 - Hermit Warbler

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 22 May 2002 Acc  nice description and great photos
Steven H. 12 Jun 2002 Acc Good photos.
Ronald R. 20 May 2002 Acc Photos are convincing.
Terry S. 21 May 2002 Acc Photos convinced me that this was not a Posible Townsend's x Hermit hybrid
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc I also saw video of this bird (wish I'd seen the bird!) - the only issue would be if it's a hybrid, and I can't see any evidence in the photos or the video that it's not a "pure" bird.
Steven S. 11 Jun 2002 Acc Photos are so nice. This looks like a clean Hermit Warbler to me.
Merrill W. 2 Jul 2002 Acc Photos of Tuula's were nice. No question on I.D.

 

2002-17 - Least Tern

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 22 May 2002 Acc Adequate description of key field marks.
Steven H. 12 Jun 2002 Acc key field marks observed.
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 Acc Bright yellow bill, black cap and white forehead makes this unmistakeable.
Terry S. 21 May 2002 Acc Description of bill, wing pattern, forehead, flight pattern convincing. This species seems to be a rare but regular migrant through the state, at least the past several years.
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc Good description - though a bit more on the destinctive flight style of this species would have helped. The size, white forehead and yellow bill eliminate other possibilities at this time of year.
Steven S. 11 Jun 2002 Acc A basic description of a rather easy bird to ID.
Merrill W. 2 Jul 2002 Acc Good description.

 

2002-18 - Canyon Towhee

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F.      
Steven H. 12 Jun 2002 N, ID Description is incomplete and too many field marks were missed to consider Canyon towhee, which is nonmigratory and unlikely to be so far out of range. Habitat and ID are closer to Green-tailed Towhee.
Ronald R. 20 Jul 2002 N, ID Not enough field marks to eliminate some sparrows (tree sparrow, lark sparrow). May well have been a canyon towhee, but I would like this to at least be discussed in a second round.
Terry S. 9 Jun 2002 Not A Not all key fieldmarks noted. For the state's second record we probably should require a more complete description.
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 N, ID I don't think that Green-tailed Towhee is completely eliminated. This would be a remarkable record for this location. The rufous on the cap as described sounds more like Green-tailed Towhee - it's not that prominent on Canyon Towhee. The "missing" colors (throat, tail, etc.) could easily have been the result of a bird wet from the recent rain, as could the "central breast spot." There's simply not enough here to support such a remarkable sighting.
Steven S. 11 Jun 2002 N, ID The Canyon Towhee is not known as a migrant or vagrant outside of it's s.w. range and habitat, so this record would be rather hard to accept with a good description. The description is too brief and some important field marks were not observed. I don't believe this person saw a Canyon Towhee in Salt Lake Co., Utah.
Merrill W. 2 Jul 2002 N, ID Inadequate description; range questionable.

 

2002-19 - Hermit Warbler

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 10 Jun 2002 Acc Very thorough description.
Steven H. 12 Jun 2002 Acc All field marks observed.
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 Acc Excellent description.
Terry S. 18 Jun 2002 Acc  
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc Excellent description.
Steven S. 11 Jun 2002 Acc This species is probably a regular (but scarce) migrant through the mountains of S.W. Utah. This is a good description and a hybrid was eliminated.
Merrill W. 2 Jul 2002 Acc Song and visual description match.

 

2002-20 - Yellow-bellied Sapsucker

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 Sep 2002 N, ID I believe this was a Red-naped Sapsucker. Red-naped Sapsuckers were not split from Yellow-bellied Sapsuckers in the edition of C. Robbin's book used by the observer.
Steven H. 10 Jul 2002 N, ID This record is likely a Red-naped Sapsucker. The referenced field guide was published prior to the split of Yellow-bellied Sapsucker so only Yellow-bellied is shown in the guide.
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 N,ID There is no description on which to evaluate this sighting. Too bad the speciman was not preserved.
Terry S. 18 Jun 2002 N, ID No attempt was made to differentiate from Red-naped sapsucker.
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 N, ID It's pretty clear that this bird was more likely a Red-naped Sapsucker - no information was given that could seperate these two, and they are probably not clearly identifiable at this time of year.
Steven S. 1 Jul 2002 N, ID Obiously this record cannot be accepted as there is no description of the bird. The observers were also using a field guide that does not show the split of this species into 3 species. The bird was most likely a Red-naped Sapsucker.
Merrill W. 25 Jul 2002 N, ID No description; and for a bird in the hand even a photo would have been nice.

  

2002-21 - Hudsonian Godwit

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 Sep 2002 Acc adequate description of breeding adult Hudsonian Godwit.
   2nd round 2 Oct 2002 Acc I still think the description is adequate for acceptance.
Steven H. 10 Jul 2002 N, ID Much of the description fits but I'm not convinced of ID. No mention of a white rump or black tail which are key marks and should have been seen.
   2nd round 17 Oct 2002 Acc A couple of key marks were missed but other details are sufficient to accept.
Ronald R. 20 Jul 2002 Acc A good description. However, it would have been unmistakeable if the observers had seen the upper and under-wing and rump in flight. I could not find any reference in my books of molt patterns of bar-tailed or black-tailed which would have had colored underparts, but still basic plumage gray on the face and neck. If this can occur, I would change my vote to No, ID.
   2nd round 1 Jan 2003 Acc My comments from the first round still apply.
Terry S. 12 Jul 2002 Acc Alternate plumaged Hudsonian Godwits are distinctive. discription was convincing.
   2nd round 1 Oct 2002 Acc  
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc They weren't able to see, or didn't note, several features (such as wing linings) which would have been helpful, but it sounds like a Hudsonian from their description.
   2nd round 13 Jan 2003 Acc No reason to change my vote.
Steven S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc This bird was well observed for over an hour. Most of a basic description for this species was given, enough to eliminate other godwits. I would think, however, that with the length of the observation time a few more field marks would likely have been seen, like what was the rump color and wing pattern. Those would have been nice to have to make a complete description.
   2nd round 13 Nov 2002 Acc I still think this was most probably what the observers saw.
Merrill W. 25 Jul 2002 Acc  
   2nd round 22 Jan 2003 Acc  

   

2002-22 - Clay-colored Sparrow

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 25 Sep 2002 Acc I also saw this individual.
Steven H. 10 Jul 2002 Acc Key field marks observed.
Ronald R. 20 Jul 2002 Acc The description of the bird was well done and convincingly a clay-colored sparrow in breeding plumage. It would have been nice to discuss why this was not a Brewer's sparrow, but I feel the description was sufficient to eliminate this similar species.
Terry S. 12 Jul 2002 Acc While I would have liked to have seen a more complete discussion separating the observed bird from Chipping and Brewers sparrow possibilities The discription was detailed.
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc Good description - head pattern rules out others.
Steven S. 25 Sep 2002 Acc Adequate description of a bird seen by several other observers.
Merrill W. 25 Jul 2002 Acc Clear description of head separated it from Brewer's Sparrow.

   

2002-23 - Philadelphia Vireo

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 25 Sep 2002 N, ID I am not convinced based on the description. I believe there needs to be more details to positively identify this species. Philadelphia Vireos should show dark loral areas, and "dark line extending BACK from eye" better fits a Warbling Vireo. In addition, the description reads "yellow, brightest at breast AND undertail". In all plumages, Philadelphia Vireos should show the brightest yellow at the center of the chest. Also to accept a difficult species like this, I would like to see more details on size and shape (of head, tail, bill, supercilium, etc.).
   2nd round 2 Oct 2002 N, ID I believe description lacks enough detail for acceptance as a Philadelphia Vireo.
Steven H. 10 Jul 2002 N, ID Description not adequate to rule out several other similar species including Warbling Vireo and Orange-crowned Warbler. A first state record should have a much more detailed description, especially of a species that is easily confused with several others.
   2nd round 17 Oct 2002 N, ID Description not adequate to eliminate a Warbling Vireo or Tennessee Warbler.
Ronald R. 20 Jul 2002 N, ID I am a bit perplexed with this record. Much of the description seems consistent with a Philadelphia vireo. However, the observers do not note dark lores, only a dark line extending back from the dark eye. A dark line extending through the eye is an important character differentiating this species from warbling vireo. More discussion of this is needed.
   2nd round 1 Jan 2003 N, ID My comments from the first round still apply.
Terry S. 12 Jul 2002 N, ID I'm concerned that not enough detail was given to overall proportions to separate this bird from a bright Warbling Vireo. Comparative observations regarding bill size, length of tail, Roundness of head and chunkiness with Warbling vireos present would help.
   2nd round 1 Oct 2002 N, ID I am still concerned that a bright Warbling VIreo has not been ruled out.
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 N, ID I don't think that they've completely eliminated a bright Warbling Vireo, or, for that matter a Yellow-green Vireo (though I would think they would have noted bill & size on the latter). The one feature that would have eliminated Warbling Vireo, a black lore, was not noted. For a Philadelphia Vireo, the black line should be both in front of and behind the eye, not just behind, as was noted. The yellow on the underparts, though bright, was of a pattern consistant with some subspecies of Warbling Vireo, and not necessarily of Philadelphia Vireo. What they saw may have been a Philadelphia Vireo, however, for a first state record, I think that we need more convincing evidence.
   2nd round 13 Jan 2003 N, ID As per my first round comments.
Steven S. 27 Sep 2002 N, ID For such a rare bird I think the description is a bit lacking (and brief) in some details. There is nothing in the description to indicate that this bird was a vireo, the bill was not described or differences given to separate out a warbler. The description could possibly fit a female Tennessee Warbler which may be more likely at a mid-May date. The dark eyeline is described as "extending back from the eye". One important mark for this vireo is the fact that the lores are also dark. Maybe this was the case but that can't be determined from the description given. This record should definitely go at least a second round.
   2nd round 11 Oct 2002 N, ID First round comments say it all.
Merrill W. 25 Jul 2002 Acc  
   2nd round 22 Jan 2003 Acc  

      

2002-24 - Painted Redstart

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 Sep 2002 Acc This singing Painted Redstart was observed by many individuals between 4/7/02 and 5/13/02.
Steven H. 10 Jul 2002 Acc Good photos.
Ronald R. 3 Jul 2002 Acc Excellent photos.
Terry S. 12 Jul 2002 Acc  
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc  
Steven S. 11 Jul 2002 Acc A bird well seen by many, including myself. It should be included in the record somewhere that this bird was first found 7 Apr. by Paul Pisano. This sighting by the Beyers was the last reported one. It was looked for by Rick Fridell after this date and not found.
Merrill W. 25 Jul 2002 Acc Helps to have someone else take photo of bird while you are present.

     

2002-25 - Vaux's Swift

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 25 Sep 2002 Acc There was a very strong Vaux's Swift flight through Utah
this spring.
   2nd round 17 Oct 2002 Acc Based on the description, timing, and number of swifts observed, I think it is highly probable that this record is a valid sighting of Vaux's Swift. Also, I agree with everyone's comments that the observers "likely saw Vaux's Swift", therefore I accept this record.

3rd round

 5 Feb 2003 Acc As per earlier comments, I still don't have a problem accepting this sighting as a Vaux's Swift.
Steven H. 10 Jul 2002 N, ID Similar species didn't mention Chimney Swift which is not eliminated by the description provided.
   2nd round 17 Oct 2002 N, ID Although the birds were likely Vaux's, which are regular migrants through Utah, the description does not eliminate Chimney Swift.

3rd round

 5 Feb 2003 N, ID While the odds favor this record being Vaux's Swift, I'm still voting to not accept this record. Observers should not assume that all Chaetura swifts seen in Utah are Vaux's.
Ronald R. 20 Jul 2002 N, ID While is is very likely the observers saw a Vaux's swift, the description cannot rule out chimney swift. Either voice or a very close observation would be needed for this. The birds were seen during the migratory period when chimney swift would be perhaps most likely.
   2nd round 1 Jan 2003 N, ID Reluctantly I still vote to not accept this record as it does not provide descriptive information to eliminate chimney swift. I would support taking this species off the review list as it has been observed almost annually in recent years.

3rd round

 19 Mar 2003 N, ID My comments from the two previous rounds still apply.
Terry S. 12 Jul 2002 [Acc]  
   (change) 21 Sep 2002 N, ID While the bird sighted was likely a Vaux's Swift I'm concerned that A Chimney Swift has not been ruled out.
   2nd round 1 Oct 2002 N, ID While I believe this sighting probably was a Vaux's Swift THe observers made no attempt to rule out the possibility of a Chimney Swift.
   3rd round 8 Feb 2003 N, ID As long as this is a review species I think it is necessary for us to review the documentation and make sure all similar species are are taken into account. As stated earlier there is nothing in the narrative that would eliminate the possibility of this being a Chimney Swift. I agree however that Vaux's Swift could probably be removed as a review species. I guess then all Chaetura Swifts seen in Utah would assumed to be Vaux's Swifts unless proven otherwise.
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 N, ID This is a hard one - I reluctantly vote not to accept, as I'm sure it was Vaux's Swift (and is consistant with the pattern of occurrence for this species in Utah), however, there was almost no discussion the central i.d. issue, why are these not Chimney Swifts??? There is no visual evidence presented which would allow us to tell these two apart, and the only evidence which might help us decide, the fact that they were silent, is not really sufficient in itself for calling this bird.
   2nd round 13 Jan 2003 N, ID I'll still vote no on this one. I know that this bird is becoming so regular that it may not need to be reviewed based upon rarity, but we do have records for Chimney Swift, and the seperation of these species is not trivial. I believe that we need to take a look at these, if only to keep people looking out for Chimney Swifts.
   3rd round 5 Feb 2003 N, ID As per previous comments .
Steven S. 25 Sep 2002 Acc Description fine and the occurence certainly fits in with this years invasion.
   2nd round 22 Dec 2002 Acc I believe this may be a species that we should look at taking off the review list. It has now apparently bred in Utah and it seems to be a species that occurs more commonly in some years than others, as in Nevada.
   3rd round 23 Feb 2003 N, ID Okay, it is right that we not accept this record since Chimney Swift apparently was not considered.
Merrill W. 25 Jul 2002 Acc  
   2nd round 22 Jan 2003 Acc  
   3rd round 27 Feb 2003 Acc I still accept the original description.

  

2002-26 - Vaux's Swift

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 25 Sep 2002 Acc  
Steven H. 10 Jul 2002 Acc Good description including call.
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 Acc  
Terry S. 12 Jul 2002 Acc  
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc I'll take this one on call.
Steven S. 25 Sep 2002 Acc Good description and again fits with this years invasion.
Merrill W. 25 Jul 2002 Acc  

  

2002-27 - Red-headed Woodpecker

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 21 Sep 2002 Acc Very well described record.
Steven H. 10 Jul 2002 Acc All field marks observed.
Ronald R. 9 Jul 2002 Acc  
Terry S. 12 Jul 2002 Acc  
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc An amazing record - great documentation.
Steven S. 11 Jul 2002 Acc A well described record and drawing of an easy ID.
Merrill W. 25 Jul 2002 Acc  

  

2002-28 - White-tailed Kite

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 25 Sep 2002 N, ID This is a tough one, description is very brief and limited. Description of underparts, flight behavior, and especially upper and lower wing pattern in flight would be helpful.
   2nd round 7 Nov 2002 N, ID I still don't think the description rules out a male Northern Harrier. The description is limited on many characteristics, and some of the details do not fit my experience with White-tailed Kites, particularly "loafing on the the ground". As Ron points out this is more like a Harrier than the typical high perches used by WT Kites. Also the "short hawk-like squawk", does not fit the typical vocalization of White-tailed Kites (series of high whistles).

3rd round

5 Feb 2003 N, ID As per previous comments
Steven H. 17 Sep 2002 Acc A little sketchy but most field marks describe this species.
   2nd round 17 Oct 2002 Acc Most field marks observed.

3rd round

5 Feb 2003 N, ID Some interesting discussion in the first 2 rounds. The brief description tends to fit White-tailed Kite more than harrier, but the behavior and voice don't match a kite. More likely to be a harrier. Given all the questions with this record, I'm changing my vote to not accept.
Ronald R. 20 Jul 2002 N, ID Another perplexing record. Black in white taile kite covers much more than lesser coverts, and eye is red with dark coloration around red eye. Male harriers can look very pale in midday sun. Also, the lofing behavior of sitting on the ground is much more consistent with harrier behavior than white-tailed kite, the latter preferring elevated perches. I would like to discuss this more if others don't have similar reservations.
   2nd round 1 Jan 2003 N, ID I am still voting to not accept this record. I don't feel the description adequately eliminates northern harrier (see my previous comments). An additional perplexing item is the lack of discussion of the legs. The white-tailed kite has very short legs which are often hard to see (much of the tarsus is covered by feathers). This is quite different in comparison to the relatively long legs of a northern harrier. The observer only mentions leg color (yellow) which would have been difficult to see on the white-tailed kite.

3rd round

 19 Mar 2003 N, ID My comments from the two previous rounds still apply.
Terry S. 5 Sep 2002 Acc description rather limited but adequate for acceptance.
   2nd round 1 Oct 2002 Acc I still accept this sighting. I believe enough information was given to rule out a male Harrier
   3rd round 8 Feb 2003 N, ID I still believe enough descriptive information was given to make me think this was a Kite. The behavior of the bird is perplexing. this area is virtually without trees. Had the kite just made a kill and that was why it was on the ground? The vocalization is not typical. I believe enough concern has been raised about this sighting by other committee members that I,m hesitant to accept the sighting with those concerns still unresolved.
Mark S. 23 Sep 2002 Acc Could have used more details in the description, but the definitive features were noted.
   2nd round 13 Jan 2003 N,ID I really hate having to deal with inadequate descriptions! This is one of the toughest calls in this batch of records, and the comments of Rick, Ron, and Steve S. are all well-made. I'm willing to discount the description about the lesser coverts as simply poor use of terminology, and the behavior of the bird as loafing on the ground as a result of the fact that there is little else in the country around Locomotive Springs. The description still seems to fit White-tailed Kite a bit better than male harrier. I was ready to once more (reluctantly) vote to accept, when I considered Rick's comment about the voice. The voice described really DOESN'T seem to fit with White-tailed Kite, and does much more closely fit with Northern Harrier. In a could-go-either-way call on all other counts, that tips the balance for me.
   3rd round 5 Feb 2003 N, ID As per previous comments
Steven S. 25 Sep 2002 Acc Although the description is brief it does seem to eliminate Northern Harrier. The observer did consider that species and described all the pertinent field marks except one (white rump or lack of one) that would eliminate harrier.
   2nd round 22 Dec 2002 N, ID There were some good first round points for not accepting this record that I agree with. I was always bothered by the described behavior of this bird. Even though the description does seem to point toward White-tailed Kite I think there is enough question on other points to not accept.
   3rd round 23 Feb 2003 N, ID I'll still go with my 2nd round vote and comments.
Merrill W. 25 Jul 2002 Acc  
   2nd round 22 Jan 2003 Acc  

3rd round   

27 Feb 2003 N, ID Based on objections of the above listed reasons I will change my vote to not accept.

  

2002-29 - Eurasian Collared-Dove

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 23 Jan 2003 Acc Although the description is quite limited, I believe the dark primaries adequately rule out Ringed Turtle-Dove.

2nd round

 5 Feb 2003 Acc This is a tough call, but I will again accept the identification based on the dark primaries.
Steven H. 17 Oct 2002 Acc Description is not very good but okay to eliminate Turtle-Dove.

2nd round

 5 Feb 2003 N, ID Good comments regarding the lack of description on underside coloration. Written description does not rule out ringed turtle-dove.
Ronald R. 6 Jan 2003 Acc Although a bit lacking in complete details, I feel the dark primaries safely separates this bird from the ringed-turtle dove. A description of the undertail coverts would have been nice. Since Eurasian collared-dove is not typically a cage bird, the origin should not be an issue.

2nd round

 24 Mar 2003 N, ID While I still feel that this bird was likely a Eurasian collared-dove, I defer to the uncertainly of some of the reviewers. Particularly, the lack of additional positive field marks (gray undertail coverts, sizable black web at the base of the tail, overall coloration of body) makes this ID not completely convincing. The dark primaries are only in contrast to the rest of the bird, and ringed-turtle dove has primaries which are slightly darker than the rest of the wing and body. Thus, "dark primaries" may not rule out ringed-turtle dove.
Terry S. 6 Nov 2002 N, ID The description given was limited and did not rule out Ringed Turtle dove. details on undertail coverts were lacking

2nd round

 8 Feb 2003 N, ID I'm Still hesitant to accept this sighting. The observer describes the wings as being a darker shade compared to its undersides. Couldn't this also describe a Ringed Turtle-Dove? Nothing is mentioned of contrasting primary tips with the rest of the wing along with other key characteristics already mentioned earlier.
Mark S. 13 Jan 2003 N, ID I'm not sure that from this description that Ringed Turtle-Dove is eliminated, which could easily be anywhere in the Salt Lake area as escapees. The only mark which would suggest EUCD over RITD is the darker primaries, and I don't think that that is a very safe call. Nothing is mentioned about the overall color, or the undertail coverts, or the underside of the tail itself. The comment that the wings were darker than the underside is better for RITD, which has a very white belly, but slightly darker wings. The dark gray belly of EUCD should be about the same color as the wings. It may be that they had a EUCD at their feeder, but I don't think that they've established that fact with this description.

2nd round

 5 Feb 2003 N, ID I'm still not satisfied with the description of this one.
Steven S. 5 Oct 2002 N, ID Although I believe this was probably this species based on size the most critical field marks for separating this species from Ringed Turtle-Dove were not mentioned. There were no details about the undertail coverts (color) and underside of the tail (amount of black at the tail base).

2nd round

 23 Feb 2003 N, ID Again although it was probably this species there is not enough description to rule out Ring Turtle-Dove.
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc  

2nd round

 27 Feb 2003 Acc The description still seems to indicate the species as identified.

  

2002-30 - Chestnut-sided Warbler

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 7 Nov 2002 Acc  
Steven H. 17 Oct 2002 Acc Good photos.
Ronald R. 2 Jan 2003 Acc Very good description, adequate photos.
Terry S. 6 Nov 2002 Acc Excellent description and convincing photos
Mark S. 13 Jan 2003 Acc Great description - the photos just clinch it. I especially like Photo "C," it's a lousy picture, but there's nothing else with that color of green on the back! Even in fall plumage, this species is distinctive.
Steven S. 3 Oct 2002 Acc  
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc  

  

2002-31 - Worm-eating Warbler

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 7 Nov 2002 Acc Neat bird. This was unexpected find.
Steven H. 17 Oct 2002 Acc Good photos.
Ronald R. 2 Jan 2003 Acc Good description and convincing photos.
Terry S. 6 Nov 2002 Acc Excellent description and photos
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Good description, photos say it all.
Steven S. 5 Oct 2002 Acc  
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc Nice photos.

   

2002-32 - Common Redpoll

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 7 Nov 2002 Acc Photos are definitive.
Steven H. 13 Jan 2003 Acc Photos adequate to positively identify this bird.
Ronald R. 2 Jan 2003 Acc I have seen the original video of this bird and it is clearly a common redpoll. I think this is a species which can be removed from the review list as it is recorded about every other year in Cache County.
Terry S. 6 Nov 2002 Acc While there was no written description, photos (while poor quality) are adequate
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Description lacking, but photos convincing
Steven S. 11 Oct 2002 Acc I think all relavant field marks can be seen in the video captures except the red color of the cap, but the black chin, streaking pattern on the underparts and pale bill clinch this ID.
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc  

   

2002-33 - Broad-winged Hawk

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 7 Nov 2002 Acc  
Steven H. 21 Nov 2002 Acc Key field marks observed.
Ronald R. 6 Jan 2003 Acc A well documented record. This species seems to occur annually so we might consider taking this species off the review list.
Terry S. 6 Nov 2002 Acc Very good description given. I believe we should consider removing this species from the review list
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Good description, analysis of similar species - do we need to keep reviewing this species, which appears every year, usually several times?
Steven S. 8 Jan 2003 Acc A very good description. The all white underwings with only a dark egde around is very good for Broad-winged Hawk, as is the tail description.
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc  

   

2002-34 - Red-necked Grebe

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 8 Jan 2003 Acc Although description is very limited, the photos are convincing.
Steven H. 21 Nov 2002 Acc Description only fair but photos adequate for positive ID.
Ronald R. 6 Jan 2003 Acc The description and photos are adequate to identify this bird.
Terry S. 28 Dec 2002 Acc Weak narrative but the photos even though they are fuzzy are convincing
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc The description on this one is inadequate, and the photos barely passable, but taken together it appears that this was a Red-necked Grebe (I believe many peope saw this bird).
Steven S. 8 Jan 2003 Acc The photo, though poor, certainly show a Red-necked Grebe.
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc Quality of photos lacking, but good enough. Description adequate.

  

2002-35  - Lawrence's Goldfinch

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 7 Nov 2002 Acc Photos leave no doubt.
Steven H. 21 Nov 2002 Acc Good photos
Ronald R. 2 Jan 2003 Acc I accept both submissions. Very good descriptions, drawing and photos.
Terry S. 6 Nov 2002 Acc Excellent documentation for Utah's First record.
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Great descriptions, photos - an excellent first-state record!
Steven S. 13 Nov 2002 Acc I wish it had stuck around more for others to see!
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc Nice photos I accept both records

  

2002-36  - Common Redpoll

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 8 Jan 2003 Acc nice photograph
Steven H. 21 Nov 2002 Acc Good photo
Ronald R. 2 Jan 2003 Acc Convincing photo.
Terry S. 28 Dec 2002 Acc  
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Acceptable description, good photo.
Steven S. 13 Nov 2002 Acc The photo leaves no doubt.
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc Nice clear photo

 

2002-37  - Red-necked Grebe

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 8 Jan 2003 Acc This grebe remained at Quail Creek until December 18,2002.
Steven H. 13 Jan 2003 Acc Good photos.
Ronald R. 2 Jan 2003 Acc Very good description and adequate photos.
Terry S. 28 Dec 2002 Acc Excellent description, convincing photos
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Excellent description, photos.
Steven S. 8 Jan 2003 Acc The photo leaves no doubt.
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc Adequate photos

  

2002-38  - Eurasian Collared-Dove

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 8 Jan 2003 Acc  
Steven H. 21 Nov 2002 Acc Key field marks seen in photos.
Ronald R. 2 Jan 2003 Acc Good description and photos. Not likely an escaped bird as this species is not typically kept as a cage bird as is the ringed turtle dove.
Terry S. 28 Dec 2002 Acc I believe these are the first photos we have for this species in Utah
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc ID is good, I've said all I will about origin . . .
Steven S. 8 Jan 2003 Acc I don't think there is should be any doubt that Eurasian Collared-Doves are showing up in the west on their own from the established populations in the east. Records are piling up every season now from many regions. Here are a few comments from the recent North American Birds magazine. Northern Great Plains: "Eurasian Collared-Doves continued at six location in North Dakota and South Dakota"; Texas: Eurasian Collared-Doves have now been reported from 188 (74%) of Texas counties"; Idaho-Western Montana: "In Idaho's Eurasian Collared-Dove news, one that wintered in Oakly stayed until 1 Apr., 3 remained in Burley … and over 20 spent the entire season near American Falls"; Mountain West: Eurasian Collared-Doves continue to appear in Wyoming" Arizona: "Apparently unabated, Eurasian Collared-Doves continued to spread: 38 were reported statewide, with sightings from Yuma to Kayenta and San Simon to Fredonia" New Mexico: Eurasian Collared-Doves continued their remarkable! colonization of New Mexico with numerous reports… from at least three dozen communities…" I think it's clear their here on their own.
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc Nice photos

   

2002-39  - Anna's Hummingbird

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 8 Jan 2003 Acc  
Steven H. 21 Nov 2002 Acc  
Ronald R. 2 Jan 2003 Acc Very good description and excellent photo.
Terry S. 28 Dec 2002 Acc Spectacular photo!
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Great description & photos.
Steven S. 9 Jan 2003 Acc You can't argue with a photo like that.
Merrill W. 26 Nov 2002 Acc Nice, clear photo

   

2002-40 - Philadelphia Vireo

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 8 Jan 2003 Acc This was a great find by Larry Tripp.
Steven H. 17 Jan 2003 Acc Combination of bright yellow center throat, dark eyestripe, white above and below eye, and short tail eliminates Warbling Vireo, which is often confused with this species.
Ronald R. 23 Feb 2003 Acc This was a very well documented record by both observers. My  experience with Philadelphia vireos is that they can clearly be
identified if seen well. I certainly feel these observers were able to very
carefully observe this bird and that the ID is correct.
Terry S. 28 Dec 2002 Acc Care was taken to eliminate a possible bright Warbling Vireo by describing morphological characteristics that differentiate the the two species. While it was difficult to get a good photo of the bird the photos taken show the rounded head, short bill, plump body.
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Finally! Here's a description and a photo of this oft-reported (lately) species which are good enough for a state-first record. The definitive marks are well-described, and visible in the photos.
Steven S. 9 Jan 2003 Acc A well documented record. Most all the field marks to separate this species from Warbling Vireo were noted. Photos, though not good, were very helpful in showing the yellow on the underparts being brighter on the throat and breast. This is a good mark to eliminate Warbling Vireo.
Merrill W. 25 Feb 2003 Acc Photos helped in the identification.

    

2002-41  - Purple Finch

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 23 Jan 2003 N, ID While this bird does appear to have a boldly patterned head, many characters visible in the photo (e.g. eye-ring, long primary projection, and underside streaking) suggest it is a female Cassin's Finch. I'd like to see this record be discussed in a second round.
Steven H. 17 Jan 2003 N, ID The bird in the photo looks a lot like a female Cassin's. The bill appears to be too large and the culmen too straight for a Purple Finch. Female Purple Finch usually has much darker ear coverts and malar stripe than the photo bird. I've seen female Cassin's with darker markings than this bird. Bird in photo also appears to have an eyering which is absent in Purple Finch.
Ronald R. 6 Jan 2003 N, ID Review of this record is helped greatly by the photo. This bird appears to me to be quite clearly a female or first year male Cassin's finch. The bold face pattern is consistent with many of the bold patterned individuals I have observed in northern Utah. The malar stripe is not darker than the auriculars/ear coverts which is consistent with Cassins finch (the malar stripe is almost black in purple finch). The upper back coloration is definitely typical of Cassins--dark streaks constasting with the much lighter background, unlike the much less contract between light and dark in purple finch. The most convincing mark for Cassins is the almost complete white eyering which is not typical of Purple finch. Unfortunately, an important field mark, the undertail coverts, were not seen and cannot be clearly seen from the photos.
Terry S. 27 Jan 2003 N, ID I'm concerned with ID given. The observer seems to be discribing the Purple Finch observed in the guidebooks and not the bird at his feeder. Describing the bill as{"eastern" Purple} does not describe the bill. Describing the tail as short therfore"purple" does not describe the length of the tail in relationship to the primary tips or the rest of the body. The entire descriptive narrative is week in this respect. I am also concerned with no description of the undertail coverts. The bird in the photo could possibly be a Purple Finch, however, with The strong facial pattern with the broad white supercillium and white below along with the heavy malar stripe. For this first round I am voting not to accept.
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 N, ID I think that this bird is a Cassin's Finch. The analysis of the Cassin's/Purple problem is hampered, I believe, by relying on inadequate references (I don't think the Kaufman book does a very good job with these species). From the photo, the rather prominent eye-ring, less distinct face pattern, and bill-shape all say Cassin's to me. Other features, such as undertail coverts, which would be helpful, are not visible and not noted in the description. In all, not adequate for a first-state record.
Steven S. 9 Jan 2003 N, ID To me this bird looks like a fairly typical Cassin's Finch. One field mark that I think is not emphasized enough in field guides is the fact that Cassin's Finches, both male and females, have very noticeable eye rings and Purple and House Finch do not. This bird has a very noticeable eyering. Another field mark that is over emphasized is the face pattern. I have seen many Cassin's Finches with very distinct malar stripes such as this bird. The back pattern on this bird looks typical for Cassin's with a light background making the dark streaks stand out. The underparts streaks are described in the report as bold and blurry but even in these slightly blurry picture they looks more narrow and well defined to me. Also the bill looks too large to be Purple. The only thing that's described that seems Purple-like to me is the call note. But it was heard only once and that may not be enough considering the photo shows a Cassin's Finch.
Merrill W. 27 Feb 2003 N, ID This bird has a pale eye ring, doesn't have the strong malar stripe expected in the Purple.  Even though it has the more distinct eye line, it's probably a Cassin's.

    

2002-42  - McCown's Longspur

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 8 Jan 2003 Acc Well decribed.

2nd round

 16 May 2003 Acc While the description is brief, I feel it is adequate. The "plain face", "broad white supercilium", "pale black streaked" back, plain whitish breast, and described tail pattern all fit McCowns and rule out Chestnut-sided Longspur.
Steven H. 13 Jan 2003 Acc The description was a little sketchy, but tail pattern of this species is unique.

2nd round

 9 May 2003 Acc Description not very good but tail pattern is unique.
Ronald R. 24 Mar 2003 Acc Good description and safely elimiated other longspur species. Observer has extensive experience with this and other longspur species.

2nd round

 27 Aug 2003 Acc My original comments still apply.
Terry S. 27 Jan 2003 N, ID This is a difficult vote. I don,t think the observer has ruled out Chestnut-collared longspur. No description was given of the bill(i.e. thick and pink or small and gray). Both McCown's and Chestnut-collared Longspurs show the "T" pattern in the tail. The early date is more typical of Chestnut-collard Longspur. The overall description of the bird with chunky shape, pale overall, pale face and breast seem to fit McCown's however.

2nd round

 27 Jun 2003 Acc After reviewing first round comments I believe the observer adequately discribes a McCown's Longspur
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Not the most detailed description, but I think that any similar species were adequately eliminated. Experience of the observer helps.

2nd round

 6 Aug 2003 Acc I'll stay with my original vote.
Steven S. 9 Jan 2003 N, ID It may be likely that this species was seen but the description was terribly short and didn't give me a feel for what the bird really looked like. The only thing that points to this species is the described tail pattern (which may be enough). The extremely early date is cause for concern given the inadequate description. Granted the observer seems well experienced with longspurs but this record definitely needs to go another round.

2nd round

 3 Jun 2003 Acc On closer reading and comments of first round votes I’ll change my vote to accept. The broad white supercilium and plain face do seem to rule out CcLo.
Merrill W. 27 Feb 2003 Acc I'll go with the description of the tail and the fact that he's had a lot of previous experience with longspurs.  Date seems odd to me, however.

2nd round

 23 Jun 2003 Acc Description still seems adequate.

   

2002-43  - Eastern Bluebird

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 8 Jan 2003 Acc thorough and convincing description
Steven H. 13 Jan 2003 Acc Good description.
Ronald R. 6 Jan 2003 Acc  
Terry S. 27 Jan 2003 Acc Excellent description and drawing
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Excellent description.
Steven S. 10 Jan 2003 Acc The description looks good and the bird was observed for several minutes by several observers over a two day period.
Merrill W. 27 Feb 2003 Acc Good description plus a nice drawing.  Plus was observed by many observers.

  

2002-44  - Red-necked Grebe

Evaluator Date Vote Comment
Rick F. 23 Jan 2003 Acc This is another example where the observer's inexperience with writing a description make the record a tough call. The description is very limited, but I will reluctantly accept this record based on the 'dirty yellow bill' and 'reddish tones in the neck'. It was seen by many additional observers...perhaps another could be persuaded to document their sighting. (Merrill?)

2nd round

 16 May 2003 N, ID I've changed my vote on this one. I agree with Terry and would really like to see a more complete write-up from another of the cited observers.
Steven H. 17 Jan 2003 Acc I'm not real comfortable with the description which is quite sketchy.

2nd round

 9 May 2003 Acc Another poor description but adequate to ID this species.
Ronald R. 24 Mar 2003 Acc The description is sufficient to identify this as a red-necked grebe. The large yellow bill eliminates horned and eared grebes, and the lack of extensive white and smaller size eliminates Clark's and western. The described color pattern is consistent with basic plumage adult.

2nd round

 27 Aug 2003 Acc I still feel the description is minimal but adequate to accept this record. Concurrence by other observers is important as well.
Terry S. 2 Feb 2003 N, ID The very sparce description did rule out a first fall Eared Grebe. I hope other observers submit more detailed descriptions.

2nd round

 27 Jun 2003 Acc A I still don't feel comfortable accepting this record based on the very limited narrative. But after reviewing other comments and the fact that Merrill also saw the same bird and accepted the sighting I am changing my vote.
Mark S. 5 Feb 2003 Acc Barely adequate description, but for a relatively distinctive species, I think it fits Red-necked Grebe.

2nd round

 6 Aug 2003 Acc Merrill's comments help supplement a poor write-up.
Steven S. 10 Jan 2003 Acc This Fall saw several Red-necked Grebes in the Great Basin. The description, though brief, does contain all information to make me feel the observer saw this species.

2nd round

 2 Jun 2003 Acc If you believe this observer saw a grebe than no other species fits with a dirty yellow bill and reddish neck other than a Red-necked.
Merrill W. 31 Jan 2003 Acc I saw the same bird.

2nd round

 23 Jun 2003 Acc I was able to observe this same bird shortly after it had been reported.  It fits all the field marks, and even though the first observer has limited experience in submitting descriptions of birds he has seen enough of us in Central Utah who saw the bird are confident that this was indeed a Red-necked Grebe.