|
If the above proposal is
accepted, what is your opinion about the following suggestions that were
brought up in the "discussion" of this proposal:
- Please indicate "For" or "Against" on each of the
following ideas:
- (These are not necessarily mutually exclusive).
-
- A. Terry's proposed amendment should be added with
only the specific language in the proposal.
-
-
Opinion: 7 For,
1 Against, 1 N/R
B. Ryan's version (summarized from a couple of different emails; lacked
specific language, but with clear ideas). Use a form email with either
accept or reject language. A "reject" email would probably have language
similar to those used in our summary pages on the web, such as "The
majority of the committee felt the description did not eliminate similar
species". This response can be sent to the observer upon completion of
the voting process and would not require additional Committee review and
deliberation, thus facilitating a relatively speedy response.
-
-
Opinion: 4 For,
4 Against, 1 N/R
C: Jack's version. Specific language: REPORTS TO SUBMITTING OBSERVERS
ARE WRITTEN AND REVIEWED BY THIS COMMITTEE (INCLUDING MILT AND THE
SECRETARY), ARE OF PUBLICATION QUALITY AND FORMAT (IDENTICAL TO THAT OF
OUR MOST RECENT RECORDS PUBLICATION), AND ARE COMMUNICATED BY THIS
SECRETARY (A SINGLE VOICE) TO THOSE WHO SUBMITTED THE RECORDS. This
approach has the added benefit of essentially writing our annual summary
since individual reports can be collated for publication at the end of
each year.
-
-
Opinion: 4 For,
4 Against, 1 N/R
D: Please draft your own
specifically worded version of what you would like to see, if it
differs from the previous options.
-
-
|